Priming meritocracy and the psychological justiWcation of inequality
نویسندگان
چکیده
The belief that status in society is based on merit is a central feature of the American Dream. This belief system justiWes status inequalities by locating the cause of status diVerences in the individual talents and eVorts of group members. We hypothesized that activating meritocratic beliefs increases the extent to which individuals psychologically justify status inequalities, even when those inequalities are disadvantageous to the self. SpeciWcally, we hypothesized that priming meritocracy prompts individuals to engage in system-justifying psychological responses when they experience threat either at the personal or group level. Across two studies, priming meritocracy led members of a low status group to justify both personal and group disadvantage by decreasing perceptions of discrimination (Studies 1 and 2) and increasing the extent to which they stereotyped themselves and their group in status-justifying ways (Study 2). © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Meritocracy dissolves the efficiency-equality tradeoff in public-goods games
One of the fundamental tradeoffs underlying society is that between efficiency and equality. The challenge for institutional design is to strike the right balance between these two goals. Game-theoretic models of public-goods provision under ‘meritocratic’ matching succinctly capture this tradeoff: under zero meritocracy (society is randomly formed), theory predicts maximal inefficiency but per...
متن کاملThe effects of meritocracy beliefs on women's well-being after first-time gender discrimination.
This study examined how meritocracy beliefs may buffer women from the negative psychological effects of an acute situation of gender discrimination. Although some research indirectly suggests that believing that meritocracy exists may increase wellbeing, group consciousness theories suggest that disbelieving that meritocracy exists will enhance psychological adjustment to gender discrimination....
متن کاملIncluding Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality
ion is necessary for broad explanatory power (Hedström and Swedberg 1998:10, 13; Kiser and Hechter 1991). 13 The mechanisms that cause ascriptive inequality to vary do not include abstract or global phenomena such as devaluation, discrimination, exclusion, exploitation, meritocracy, oppression, and social closure that describe but do not explain patterns of inequality (e.g., Reskin 1988; Tomask...
متن کاملبررسی ابعاد و مولفههای شایستهسالاری در مدیران و کارکنانِ موسسات آموزشی
The concept of meritocracy in the principles of organization and management, in addition to involving the characteristic manifestation of selection, appointment and retention of managers, specifically includes a range of key factors to build a system of meritocracy, upon which there has not been a general consensus so far. Accordingly, any analysis concerning the origins, challenges and obstacl...
متن کاملDesigning and Explaining the Model of Managers' Meritocracy in the Oil Industry
The aim of this study was to design and explain the meritocracy model of managers in the oil industry. In the qualitative part of the research, using the snowball technique, 20 experts were interviewed and using the Delphi analysis method, six main dimensions including: Merit-will, Merit finding, Merit selection, Merit appointment, Merit breeding, Merit maintenance and 39 index was extracted. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006